Jew Gifts?

Outline:

-Perelman is a Jew name, and is the Perelman associated with Perelman Center actually Eli Perelman-Storch?

Perelman-Storch is a Jew name that means "pearls of [Jew] ejaculate that generate a child (storchs are birds that in fable bring a child to a mother and father)." "Pearl" is often used as slang reference to ejaculate [ie "a pearl necklace"] as it has a similar color and reflectivity to that of a white pearl. Pearls are the result of an oyster attempting to take a painful thing and make it less painful: a sharp and painful grain of sand inside an oyster, then coated with a shell-like material, making it smooth and agreeable. Pearls are a reference to symptomatic resolution rather than the achievement of actual resolution (ie, the removal of the sand particle from within the oyster). Given that pearls are associated with symptomatic

(image from: https://www.pennmedicine.org/for-patients-and-visitors/penn-medicine-locations/perelman-center-for-advanced-medicine , retrieved: 2025-04-11 , used under copyright fair-use provisions )

(c) 2025 Peter Frazier

nous

resolution, it is interesting that U Penn chose the name, "Perelman Center," for the name of a medical facility and that the architecture of the entrance section of the building is made mostly of glass, where glass is usually made of silica (which is the primary component of sand) and is in the shape of a silica crystal (otherwise known as a "grain of sand")... even more interesting when so many painful things over the past 25 years (and beyond) were, in moniker, associated with sand: Sandusky, attacks on Ian Sandberg, Elizabeth Dun[e]lap, the clandestine program known as "Sandstorm," pearl harbor[?], sand box[-ing], Sands-Casino-to-Winds-Casino, etc..

Was Perelman (Jew) attempting to make the claim that Jew ejaculate is useful, in part, because it presumptuously mitigates pain to women (and perhaps homosexual men)? ...likely the circumstance; so to further explore the nature of that endeavor, a question: what is the most true pain to women? An answer to that question generating insight into what Perelman (Jew) are attempting to do and what feelings or senses they are attempting to mitigate. The presumed philosophy of Eve described in the context of her name and the word, "entropy:" Eve as meaning "see" achieved more completely when anti-dimension [topographically, "entropy"] is dimensioned, yielding the mitigation of entropy and the achievement of perception... the obligation to that endeavor, as the character "n" in the word "entropy," is actually pain to Eve... a pain that is resolved via inference, imagination, hypothesis and learning... becoming more herself is the "tropy" ( akin to a male riches as "trophy"), a reward as "eyes ici," perception achieved devoid of feces or fallacy, wealth to her: the third eye of illuminati? Do you want the Perelman to succeed writing their dark age history preemptively truncating the perception of pain that is ignorance, fallacy and hypocrisy? Do you want a pacific life, a pleasure that you did not achieve, or do you want real so real that it is known as "reallity?" When you look into the darkest of darkest night, the realm of anti-dimension (ignorance) do you want to be misled with dreams where God is syphilis, science as traditions of sisiphus?

Was Sandi Morris an elixir of pleasure synthesized by Perelman as yet another Jew gift? Was she peril-to-man? Sandbox? ...an implied, and horrific ultimatum: the asymmetric circumstance of private oratory (the mistaken precept that a gift is only meant to generate a unilateral pleasure): sing box to sand box... only too late did you realize that you fed an uncontrollable female desire... to covett: your mind, your world, every inch of your body. A siren song quarantined on beaches built by the owner of that entrance into the utmost beautiful mystery... the fertile crescent, a region of salacious pleasure when provoked with a slight measure, a topography of hers, if time, then forever. Why didn't the siren birds fly away... because they were not gay... like sailors at the bay... what do you say... hey... back to that private oratoraaaaay. ...sand boxed forever. The apple of Aphrodite, the sand in her box, a sandbox? A discontent, like circumstance: the aggravation of the oyster... the pearl smoothing the lyrics to no lyrics at all? ...a sad silent spring, no song at all, will never lead to the autumn, only the fall.

I wonder if Perelman Center activities target activists that create legitimate press articles regarding nefarious subhuman activities: something so painful to the subhumans involved (...but, in truth, discovery is requisite to successfully implement recovery) and attempt to "treat away that pain:" killing pain by poisoning the progenitors: the activists, the artists, the scientists, the press. Perhaps the whiteness of the pain-killing aspect of the pearl, is synonymous with the white, arterial calcification-like layers that cultivate myocardial-infarctions when a person is poisoned with strontium (Sr). Communist groups (CSA, etc.) have notoriously used strontium to advance the topographically plausibly deniable killing of so many freedom fighters like Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia, and those that cultivate truth so inconvenient, so painful to Jew whore, faggit, rapists, misogynists, communists and other subhuman. The International Criminal Court human rights investigators are required to precisely spectroscopically analyze arterial calcification-like substances of contentious, nationalist and feminist political activists in the United States, particularly those that have been patients of the University of Pennsylvania . I wonder if Perelman Center resources have collaborated with Joseph Stalin's grandson (a radical communist who resides in Eastern, PA and is, in part, a sound technician that works to develop acoustic attacks as "hearing attacks" [as a reference to "heart attacks"]), the Athenian communist terrorist organization known as the "Massachusetts Institute of Technology," DHS, other legacy Soviet Socialists, FOP and/or Mossad...

The word "sand" is the opposite of the word "land" as the word "land" etymologically means "soand." It is important to note that the phrase "the word" means "virtuous mind of the USOOOA" or similarly (but not the same), "virtuous mind of the USOA" where "USOA" is a reference to the [reall] "United States of America." This is interesting because the program created by Bush Jr, and the DD (subverted DOD) strangely includes the word "sand" and is known, in full, as "sandstorm." The word "sandstorm" etymologically means "attack on [the word] land" (actually a "storm of attacks on [the word] 'land'"): realize that Bush Jr., Free Masons, Scot, Vatican, and Israel did just that on the morning of 2001-09-11: they implemented an "attack on [the concept of] land" with Flight 11, 93, 77, and 175 by making horrible approaches and, essentially horrible landings... when in the distant past beautiful people, like Zepplin, created extremely long duration 'flight' with airships, thereby potentially mitigating the need to "land" with the use of outlyingly tall towers as spire moores (to allow the airships to latch on and swivel around [due to changes of wind] without harming other structures and without actually landing), which is exactly why the spire of the Empire States building was created, why it is so tall, and why the Empire States building is so strong (...to handle the wind drag from gigantic airships tethered onto it's spire). Zepplin achieved something that was so beautiful, something towards the creation of "Octavian" or the "infinite avian" (mystical, Incan like civilizations in the sky) whereas modern scum (Jew: Scot, Vietcong, Bush Jr., free Masons, subhuman, etc.) did something, knowingly or unknowingly abstractly similar (rapist often have no idea how much they harm existence), but their implementation, so fucking disgusting (founded by their own corrupted morality and the dis-recognition that each persons' own thoughts, words and deeds, left done and undone, define the future (especially in the preeminent and amazing, America)... they never became man, human, but rather continued as children of a plurality, they were the children of men, destined to believe that apologies to men were synonymous with apologies to God: earthy, validation in the context of their kind, with the work of the subhuman, the copper (government), psychiatrists' sample studies inescapably comprised of common mediocrity [their feces, their victims as peers], affirmed the consequences of raping of man, women and children as normal, testament to the jurisdiction and popularity of subhuman addiction): they attacked the World Trades... attacks that were ponzi schemes of rapists played-out, derivative by-products of rape, fraud, con, theft, and generally, free-mason, roman catholic, & kike sleeze... a kind and characteristic that misceginated into the US long ago via Roosevelt and the Weimar faggits that attempted to run away from their stench asses (the consequences of their life and actions), free-mason pyramids of filth and tyranny, institutes of psychologists, psychiatrists and psychoanalysts, instantiated to contend with the protections of freedom, liberty and happiness: subhuman wanted a despotic jurisdiction over man.

The Gary Deleo-like reporter from the ground saying "oh the humanity" on the video news-reel as the Hindenburg burned in the sky: the horrific satire of the disease now known as Bush Jr., critiquing the erian concepts of human versus subhuman, just as it did on 2001-09-11: the lambasting of the Illuminati, by creating a transiently and tragically elevated spire (of fur [bush]) in and on both pyramids/towers/buildings (World Trade Center I) (World Trade Center II)

En francias, le mot, "sans," means something (topographically) like the English word, "without;" perhaps interesting implications in the CONtext of the word, "sands," as the word "sands" is likely a reference to the mitigation of a french "sans," resulting in something similar to the word, "with." In Spanish, the french word, "sans" is similar to the opposite of the word "con:" perhaps the opposite of "con" is "nocon" as "cns" (in Spanish)? Yet "sands" also means, "sets," in English-French etymology which is a reference to flying (as "nene") and the word "never..." which then describes the Cyrillic "Het [as, "net"] as "no," a "no" that generates intelligence as "know" which contradicts "sans as cns" (in Spanish and French) [as a side note, this implies that Jew use of the term "know" in social and/or sexual context, implies that Jew social pursuits, in Cyrillic speaking regions, are often viewed as rape]. This creates linguistic contention between Spain and France, where "Spain" means "vpisn" or "two individuals having sex," implying that "con" in Spanish is a derogatory word as it corrupts sex... individuality is forged via empathy: self-reliance, perspective, contrast, delineation , discrimination, and separation... things that affront the concepts of "with" and "we." Yet without "with:" "I" not WITH "I," Spain will not be conceived, no Is achieved? Is box requisite for sex in Spain? ...a vexing question: does that means that "convex" is then synonymous with the effect of "Het" (as "net") in Cyrillic? With thought, a contradiction... thought means no sing box? Are the words "concave" and "convex" (important because they are associated with [1] extremely important words like sight, lenses, press, etc., [2] both words have the prefix 'con,' and [3] are extremely associated with sexual metaphor) hostile etymological precepts in the pursuit of achieving sex in Spain? Both "convex" and "concave" are highly associated with the press, in that kunniform (relationally external, "cunniform") (otherwise known as, sierofier [relationally external, "cierofier"]), is made of a convex lump of clay (making copying difficult)... the relationship between convexity and concavity is extremely part of the primordial generation of the press. Is sex in Spain achieved only with "konkave" and "konvex" (as per the "c" in "cunniform," then to a "k" in "kunniform" [with exclusivity], and visa-versa [with generality]), and then perhaps, "konkace" and "koncex" (as per the "s" in "sierofier," then to a "c" in "cierofier" [with generality] and visa-versa [with exclusivity])? ...the former being the most likely for female, as it describes the existence of cave (via the death of kave), while the latter is most likely for male, as it describes the death of sodomy, rape and/or penis-in-shit (via the death of "cex"). Alors, moi, Leige de la France (av[oir]ec mon blanc etap), aimes Spain (konkave et koncex). However, the question of "sand box" as an origin of tyranny within Spain remains. An unwanted or an accepted circumstance? What about French freedom and liberty? Does sing box break uppercase "q," generating ayb (in armenian), then the letter "u," then Freud misceginates the French language and declares mentally ill as fou, but only if you reject the sodomy that builds every Jew? Anticipated answer to some of these questions could imply that there are associations between regions that were previously Spanish colonies (like Florida and "Cuba"), the agenda of Bush Jr. (disease) and horrific losses like the gold stolen from Fort Knox [the fake Spanish galleon shipwreck discovery in about 2011 by US treasure seekers, and then, by court order, bizarrely sent to Spain... when, in truth, all of it was actually stolen from Fort Knox]), indicating that the Spanish could be highly associated with the Panam Flight 103 attack, Sandusky, Perelman, domestic spying, etc.. Although, clarifications here may indicate that a bulk of "sing storm" attacks emanate from that other than "blanc pen:" (1) ANC (South Africa ) blacks and many other black populations have high HIV rates throughout the world (per capita) as they tend to dis-recognize HIV as a viral disease, have anal sex and they tend to rape, (2) The National Defense Authorization Act, known as NDAA, is a reference to the word "nigger," and it were those funded by that act that created "sandstorm" otherwise known as "sing storm," where first responder sirens, train horns, mufflers and car horns are used as broadcast notifications to torture targets (usually blanc) via stalking (presumably to keep "feces" safe), (3) blacks are more willing to rape people and to use rape as a tool to achieve some goal, (4) Sandi Morris ("sing bomb III") detonaterd when she married a black man (indead she achieved, "noir pen").

It's interesting to realize that "con casino" in Northampton County's, Bethlehem, PA (operated by, Winn/Wynn, a Phi Gamma Delta [same national fraternity as George W. Bush, Jr.], as "Sands Casino," could have been a precursor to a sandstorm, in a similar way in which "Ian Sandberg" of Buckingham Friends School, approximately, class of 1995, was a precursor to a Sandstorm (where attacks on him by Sean Mount and Jacob Toll [of the Toll Brothers] were a kike attack on Rommel's North Africa campaign). If "Sands Casino" was a precursor to sandstorm, then Winn's supposed sale of the "Sands Casino" (likely stolen by communists) to a company that named the property "Winds Casino," is fairly blatant re-affirmation of that theory. It is likely that communist's like Charles Rumble (first responders, fire-fighters, police, free-masons, etc.) were associated with the renaming of "Sands Casino" to "Winds Casino," where they were indicating, via the name "Winds" that they killed "Winn" ("Wins" mitigated as "dWins," as "Winds") and stole his property: the Sands, Luxor, casinos in Macau, .etc). I wonder if Winn of Winn Casinos made the mistake of buying a house in John's Island, Vero Beach, FL? If so, New Hope, PA homos probably had a fun time appropriating that estate... it kept ass fucking faggits, "safe." How similar is the present-day Winn with the true Winn of the distant past? Did the free-mason impostures make a believable fraud? The point is that Sands was blown by Wind, and made a disgusting sandstorm. It is also interesting that "con casino" (from "Sands Casino") is etymologically similar to "capsaicin" (where, "con casion"->"cog iscin"->"cog ccin"->"cog feces in"->"shit head" & "capsaicin"->"cig gicin"->"cog ccin"->"cog feces in"->"shit head" [sort of]) where capsaicin is the origin of tear gas: perhaps Sands Casino knew that they would generate tears (rapist pedophilia, sadness, lives destroyed). Given the efforts of Hilary Rodham Clinton, particularly when she was governor of NY but also during her involvement with the US State Department, which include direct attacks on my family (and the family business) via her cronies in the NYPD: in 2006 an NYPD agent (also associated with MIT) attempted to get the family business to manufacture capsaicin based chemical munitions presumably for "crowd control." When I told him that the company doesn't manufacture that sort of thing, the agent sent 1 kg of capsaicin to the facility anyway: if that package opened in shipping it could have killed all workers in a normal sized post processing facility. That particular "delivery" is an example of abstract chemical weapons deployment in the USOA, and is an example of the NYPD engaging in chemical weapons deployment domestically in the USOA, and part of the reason why both the NYPD and MIT are considered terrorist organizations in the USOA. Subsequently, the NYPD and the US Coast Guard, were directly associated with the illegal stealing of both that company, and an associated residence known as "Waterside." Once in control of the company, the terrorists then oriented the company to do business with the US government (CAGE contracts): it is likely that US government scum are using that (or preparing to use that) facility to package chemical weapons for the terrorists that are the US police and DHS. it is extremely likely that "Sands Casino" and now the "Winds Casino" is used, in part, as a chemical and biological weapons development facility that is directly associated with DARPA Brown Sky, New Biological Subversions (Jericho), and "Real Ryan." As with most free-mason attacks they heavily rely upon collective manipulation, sand-boxing and fraud, particularly body-double impostures (usually as a means of stealing estates via the augmentation of wills, then the purchasing of a house in places like John's Island, Vero Beach FL [or some other con-ring], where that organization then shields the discovery of death, which in-turn confounds the pursuit and achievement of legal remedy).

I wonder if the "Sands Casino" and then the "Winds Casino" was and/or is a method by which Lehigh University's Gary Deleo and cons like Andrew Desalvo (both of whom are (Italian, Albanian, like) archetypes of a fake CIA interrogator that interrogated Sadam Hussein), distributed the stolen gold and resources from Fort Knox, the estate transfer thefts associated with John's Island (Vero Beach, Florida) and the proceeds of other forms of fraud? Does the Casino skew results such that the participants actually win at higher probability then they otherwise would, and are those winnings associated with fraternal brothers, communists and other scum that are part of that racket (if it exists)? I wonder if there are strange loopholes in PA gaming regulations that bias regulation of gaming by assuming that the casino doesn't want to lose money, and thus regulators tend to make sure that the house is fair to the players more so than to the casino. Is it that the house notifies the gaming commission if they find disproportionate winnings by any given player? ...but what if they are attempting to launder funds in the form of winnings to certain players?

Do Jew consider Pennsylvania to be a potential threat to their continuity? PENN as PNS as NS (axis), thus potentially a threat. Where "sylvania" is a reference to the "forest or woods," which was likely a reference to the garden of Eden.

-Does the University of Pennsylvania always "sell-out" to anti-america interests? ...they also created the "Penn Presbyterian" medical building, (Presbyterian religion is highly associated with the Scot) and it has become blatantly obvious that Scotland is an enemy of the reall United States of America (Scot collaboration with North Korean counterfeiting and laundering of US currency, pan-am flight 103 attack, Sandusky, Sergei Brin, Sandstorm, etc.).

-Why was ABM (Anti-Ballistic Missile) defense developed and why did that platform correlate with the Israeli development of something similar, but on a much smaller scale, "Iron dome?" Were kike (ie "Jew") the primary entities that subverted the USOA CIA on 2001-09-11, and then infiltrated and convoluted the strategic development of USOA defense such that it protected 4n interests of the State of Israel and Vatican, Scotland, etc., at the cost of USOA security?

Why are substantial portions of ABM defense advanced and owned by Israeli Jew front companies like "Space-X" and "Amazon?" ...both of which are "owned" by Jew (Elon Musk and Jeffrey Bezos, respectively), wherein the primary assets referenced are LEO satellite networks that are used for three things, (1) LORA/WoT radio side-channel/backdoor spying on most modern electronic devices (that have processors) to truncate cottage-industry development in the USOA and to combat US citizens that attempt to develop technical resources and platforms that are strategic threats to the State of Israel and the Vatican, (2) to visually spy on private property throughout the world, but particularly in the US, as a means of counter-acting the implementation and synthesis of neo-holocaust resources in the USOA and beyond and to devalue private property via illegal publication/stalking, (3) kinetic resources to intercept both USOA and other countries ICBM warheads in both the ascent and descent phase of their telemetries. It is extremely likely that the State of Israel and the Vatican have "democratized" the control of those resources so as to attempt to block all ICBM use (which then favors Israeli and Vatican methodologies of war such as biological and chemical war, both traditional and asymmetric deployments, such as rape, particulate, and esoteric methodologies like active fomite [infectious birds, insects, whore, faggit, workers (ie "Typhoid Mary"), etc.]).

In light of the pearl harbor attack (and how the US may have known about that attack ahead of time and still allowed that risk to develop), and considering the effects of a large scale ICBM attack on naval surface fleet resources, did the pacific command become the primary proponent of ABM defense? If there were to be all-out nuclear war, then the pacific command surface fleets would take the greatest losses, thus those resources are considered to be the most vulnerable to large-scale nuclear attacks... the very thing that ABM defense was made to defend against. The skepticism that the USN Pacific Command has of Washington and the US population in general is probably well founded, given the circumstances of the Pearl Harbor attacks. Was ABM defense initiated almost exclusively by the USN Pacific Command, and if so, is that an example of the USN Pacific Command (a large military) believing that it's strategic interests actually superseded the interests of free-US citizens? In that MAD (mutually assured destruction) was an extremely useful tool for US citizens to dissuade rapist US government (and possibly military) from engaging in the application of tyranny (rape as government, etc.) by playing the other side of the table... often times tyranny attempts to reject the precept that with the expansion of tyranny always comes the legitimate (and compensating) expansion and jurisdiction of Constitutional rights: a second amendment preserving gun ownership and use in a freer America, and with tyranny the 2nd amendment securing the creation and jurisdiction (use) of things like nuclear weapons to mitigate tyranny. ABM Defense, skews MAD such that an ICBM strike by the US could occur without a successful retorting attack, which means smaller things like Russian espionage against the US government could provoke an all-out nuclear war that the US could actually win, with Russia losing... rather than a MAD outcome; thus limited jurisdiction implementations of Russian assisted applications of deterrence to US government entities blatantly violating US Constitutional law from a US militia's perspective, a type of activity that was somewhat common over the previous 60 years, then no longer a resource to restrain illegal US government activity (resulting in the intolerable birth of swine rapist commi government scum raping and torturing the population without any real legal consequence). It is blatantly obvious that the only entity that has benefited from ABM defense is USN Pacific Command, US government contractors, and un-elected bureaucratic US government workers, while with ABM defense US citizens have experienced an extreme decrement in their achievements of life, liberty and happiness... government governing with methods synonymous with Vietcong psychological war tactics, casual raping of journalists with cock, cunt and needle, threatening the press with first responders' sirens, dis-acknowledging death when strategically unfavorable, compiling judiciaries with military staff, etc..

When a military changes a population that it was tasked to defend so as to take the military out of harm's way, is that a failure of defense and/or a form of subversion? Has the USN Pacific Command done this, and if so, to what extent: riches of the private industry mitigating the Bacchalian harm of less than perfect pleasure? ...hmm, where did my estate go Jericho? Which US government faggit or whore is squatting on my property (Waterside) commi scum?

If the USN Pacific Command really has changed life in the US to suffice the Commands' interests, is U Penn's Perelman Center being used by the Pacific Command to further change the domestic US: using Jew and convoluted medical resources to block the development of nationalism in Pennsylvania and New Jersey... using Perelman Center to block Pearl Harbor-like harm to the USN Pacific Command at the cost of life, liberty and happiness pursued (and achieved) by US citizens?

EAMs screaming assassin's creed: the USS Pennsylvania free-lancing as Tibia-Tiberon preserving USOA deed?

Harvard Law School, the realm of the "virtuous man" (HLS as pnnn) versus (and clashing with) Perelman (peopleman: pdman/gpman)... U Penn armed with Perelman (peril-to-man) could be attacking HLS via the police state (pd and gp)... U-Penn as a U-boat enigmatically attacking the virtuous man? Instigators may have made it so, although, there could be virtuous man on the U-boat, and/or the existence of a paradigm where virtue righteously attacks virtue (a cat fight... a world war... a hot girl pulling the hair of who she claims to be a trash whore). Is U Penn collaborating with MIT to advance fra-u-d: a world where "Haverford" wasn't a drunkard slurred articulation, but rather "Harvard," and a world where Cletis Layman, really was a professional (rather than Perelman's achievement, a creature of the clovis people)? The darpa-brown-sky endeavor (employing disease as a cunter-argument to objectively separate communication) appears to include: Haverford, MIT, Princeton(?), U Penn(?), George School, Lawrenceville, and Newtown Friends School. U-Penn and HLS could be friends again: the thinking man on the will, gate 2 foreign gate, camouflage safeguarding the virtues of Hell... evidence of fishy war-fare [taki, maki, sushi... the hibachi of the Mikado, a samurai's lair, exquisite knife work, seen by the eye's of the French heir: but their trade created fishy fare that protected Err, they drew brown out of the air] defenses marred with the primary weapon: carp[e], the very existence of the attack indicating a suffix of "diem:" Miriam, mirroring the enemy, on the other side of the phalanx, safe-guards will come to see him, subhuman successful, then no eyes to perceive them?

-Why was Pearl Harbor attacked?

Why didn't the US attempt to stop the attacks (as they had plenty of information regarding the incoming Japanese squadron)? Could it be that the USN Pacific command has always acted as a repository for young rapist men whose cultural practices tend to debase and destroy the building blocks of America? If so, then were the "Pearl Harbor" attacks a means of removing communist, rapist scum from US culture... such that they would not come back into free US culture, and thereby advance subhuman objectives (in the same way that a foreign enemy would advance): via things like rape, and intellectual under development?

assets associated with people and companies that are strategic problems to tyrannical US Navy, Jew and Roman objectives (dark age, misogyny, collectivism, communion., stalking, etc.) ? Those activities, in part, underpin the state of war that exists between the United States of America and the Vatican, and the United States of America and the state of Israel.

-Is the word "Center" of "Perelman Center" a reference to the "Center" of the "World Trade Center[s]?"

If so, is that a promoting or demoting reference in reference to the objectives of the "World Trade Center[s]?" For example "Southern Poverty Law Center" was a communist critique that rebuked the objectives of the "World Trade Center[s]" and was hostile to that[/those] entity[/entities], as were the "Spiritual Centers" of the Meher Baba [aka "Ma Baba"] Soviet Socialist communist group [ostentatiously a "cult"] operating, in part, out of Myrtle Beach South Carolina... members of that "group" celebrated the destruction of some of my family friends from a dock on the West side of the Hudson on the morning of 2001-09-11.

-Is Perelman as a reference to Pearl Harbor... Is the USN (US Navy, cultural enemy of the United States of America) associated with the Perelman "gift" to to the University of Pennsylvania?

If so was that "gift" compiled from money acquired via the clandestine (illegal) military and government program known as "Trail Blazer," which, in part means, "burn the financial accounts ["tails"] of the world trades [the "Is" aka "eyes"]..." achieved, in part, via"Jericho" which is a reference to the RICO-ing of USOA

(image from: https://fortune.com/2017/12/06/pearl-harbor-day-2017, retrieved: 2025-04-11 , used under copyright fair-use provisions )

(https://archives.upenn.edu/exhibits/penn-history/seals-arms-usage/ , retrieved 2025-04-12)

The US Navy Pacific Command apparently re-wrote the history of U Penn's symbols (https://archives.upenn.edu/exhibits/penn-history/seals-arms-usage/ , retrieved 2025-04-12) in a way that was complimentary to the Commands' objectives of promoting all things rape, insidious, orchestrated, numb, flaccid, passive and jewtopian. They make a claim that the shield-shaped symbol is actually an "arm" rather than a "shield." They make a claim that the sea creature on the "arm" is actually a dolphin (presumably a derogatory reference to the Dauphine of France [Leige De La France] as the dauphine is a symbol of french royalty), even though it blatantly looks like a carp.* There is then a book to either side of the "dolphin" on the head of the "arm." Since a shield is not really an arm as it is a passive defense implement (like a castle wall), then could it be that the U Penn shield is actually a reference to an active

implement of attack [an armament], a war ship: the hull of that ship (similar to that of the clam shell in which Aphrodite traversed the sea), where the crest of the shield, is synonymous with the bow and bow-crest of, and about, a ship? If so, then by claiming that the sea creature on the hull of the ship is a "dolphin," is U Penn threatening the life of the Leige de la France [aka le Dauphin] by implying that U Penn uses their organization as a transport mechanism, in particular, a ship, to attack the King of Americi (where "here" is en francais)? Does U Penn realize that the first entity to use large transportation mechanisms as a weapon were the Ancient Athenians, where they built battering ram spars below the waterline extending from the bow of their ships, and employed them in battle by ramming their bows (battering rams) into enemy infantry transport ships (sinking they and their infantries at sea)? Does U Penn realize that a more recent entity that used large transportation mechanisms as weapons were the free-masons, Jew, Roman and USN Pacific Command on the morning of 2001-09-11, where their targets (waypoints) were the World Trade Centers and the Pentagon? Anyway, anti-french bias from U Penn culture is interesting and may indicate strong associations between U penn and free-masonry, which could indicate the presence of perceptional and ethical bias that possibly superceeds an allegiance to co-factors of the free: when Ben Franklin (a free-mason Philadelphian) was in France (as a Diplomatic envoy) he had extremely poor relations with the Leige de la France, which was odd because of the support that the French provided to the colonists in the War of Independence. As a side-note, the presumptive king of France at the time, Louis XVI was not really of French royal lineage, as his grandfather, Louis XIV was not really the son of Louis XIII (also of note that "DHS" means "Kill XIS," "Kill XX," and "Kill XIV"), but rather an imposture placed there by free-masons (so as to destroy the French monarchy... and for a while, they succeeded, until now [achtung jeuden]). Could it be be that Ben Franklin and his fellow free-masons created artwork for U Penn that was hostile to the Leige de la France and bent a USOA academic endeavor away from cognitive success and towards plebeian peasant civility? According to the aforementioned site, "It had its origin at a meeting of the [U Penn's] Board of Trustees in [1755] with Benjamin Franklin as Chairman..." (https://archives.upenn.edu/exhibits/penn-history/seals-arms-usage/ , retrieved 2025-04-12).

The USN Pacific Command's choice of declaring the shield an "arm" and then implying that that arm was an anti-french monarchy war ship is interesting... the book on each side of the "bow" (of the ship) may metaphorically indicate a parting of the sea (where each book could be a metaphorical reference to sea water as part of the bow crest)... the sea being something that is not the ship and is hostile to "ship" and in that sense, the sea opposite to or contrasting with the ship. If the word "ship" is interpreted as "gip" (given the nature of sailors, both of those things "ship" and "gip" essentially mean the same thing: the destruction of "ip" [aka intellectual property]), then as sea contrasts with ship, a repository of IP, a book, contrasts with gip... it may be that U Penn is claiming that the shield is actually a ship, a ship that's keel harmed a dolphin, blood spilling into the Christian communion cup: an elixir of life for those that lost their "i" within what could have been their "Je suis." This may indicate that the revised history of U Penn was written in a way that was made to be extremely favorable to the British, particularly the King of England. It may also be a reference to the Mosy's parting of the red seas,* thereby insinuating U Penn's strong allegiance with kike... Israeli.

The motto associated with the shield reads, "Leges sine Moribus vanae." Where the US Navy Pacific Command claims that that means, "Laws without morals are useless" (https://archives.upenn.edu/exhibits/penn-history/seals-arms-usage/ , retrieved 2025-04-12). In actuality, "Leges sine Moribus vanae" means something like, "the all-knowing king, God, brings death to those who rape" a meaning that is extremely similar to phrases like "do not discharge your muskets until you see the whites' of their eyes" (as "only kill those who have whites rather than blanc to it's eyes") and the Constitution's "land owning [blanc] men" (as "those who consider inherent self-ownership to be an achieved human right, and who bring death to men of sodomy").

What could be the revised interpretation? Rather than satiating subhuman, make the decision that all those transcendent must make: either you choose sub-human, die quickly and create a culture of death, Haedes for all others that remain alive or you choose human and die less quickly. The "arm" is not an arm, but rather a shield. That the sea creature thereon is a carp, thrown through the air to attack someone's liberty, and it was the shield that the carp (as carpe) slammed into rather than it's intended target... carpe was stopped by the defenses, but left an indelible mark on U Penns' symbolic references. The attack methodologies, their 4n culture, will be the enemy of the USOA in perpetuity... la leige declares, "virtue is the death of Jew."

Was it the Jew "gift" that motivated U Penn to change it's history into something less true?

* note: the carp is a fresh water fish that may have evolved into the salt water grouper.